masthead

Powered byWebtrack Logo

Links

Bid to end US-Israel row ‘a humiliation’

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trip to the United States to patch up relations ended in "humiliation" as Washington dressed down its close ally over settlements, Israeli media said on Thursday.

Leading newspapers said Netanyahu now has his "back to the wall", with US President Barack Obama demanding major steps to revive the peace process that threaten the premier's mostly right-wing coalition.

Netanyahu insisted ahead of his departure that the two sides had made "progress" in resolving a row over continued construction in annexed Arab east Jerusalem which has hindered US efforts to revive the peace process.

But Israeli army radio said the visit had done little to repair relations and was at best a "disappointment" and at worst a "resounding failure".

Israel's Haaretz newspaper said Netanyahu had left Washington "disgraced and isolated" after a flurry of meetings that unusually included no public statement or joint photo opportunity.

"Instead of a reception as a guest of honour, Netanyahu was treated as a problem child, an army private ordered to do laps around the base for slipping up at roll call," it said.

Israel's Maariv newspaper said: "There is no humiliation exercise that the Americans did not try on the prime minister and his entourage.

"Bibi received in the White House the treatment reserved for the president of Equatorial Guinea," it added, using Netanyahu's nickname.

Israel's Yediot Aharonot said the carefully coordinated dressing down came with an explicit demand from Obama that Netanyahu take measures to restore confidence with the Palestinians, who have refused to negotiate with Israel without a settlement freeze including east Jerusalem.

Obama demanded that Netanyahu extend a limited 10-month settlement halt past its deadline, pull Israeli forces back from parts of the West Bank and release hundreds of prisoners in a gesture to Western-backed Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, the daily said, citing unnamed sources.

"Everyone understood that this time Obama had Netanyahu with his back to the wall," it said.

The two close allies have been mired in a diplomatic crisis since Israel announced plans to build 1,600 settler homes in east Jerusalem earlier this month during a visit by US Vice President Joe Biden.

The move dealt a major blow to US-led peace efforts, coming just two days after the Palestinians had reluctantly agreed to indirect talks, and was seen as a major challenge to Washington's credibility as a mediator.

Netanyahu apologised for the timing of the announcement but has vowed to continue building in east Jerusalem, which Israel seized in the 1967 Six Day War and annexed in a move not recognised by any other government.

Israel views the entire city as its "eternal, indivisible" capital, while the Palestinians have demanded the eastern part, home to some 270,000 Arabs and 200,000 Jews, as the capital of their promised stat

# reads: 170

Original piece is http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/bid-to-end-usisrael-row-a-humiliation-20100325-qzwv.html


Print
Printable version

Tell us what you think


ICJS correctly notes that the Age reports Israeli media reports, not direct knowledge. Thus the Age defers responsibility onto the accuracy (or lack thereof) of the Israeli reports. The Israeli media, as a rule, is viciously anti-Netanyahu, and has been since he was elected the first time. Thus, even a decade ago, when Netanyahu went to Washington and stood his ground, conceding nothing, the media reported his successful trip as a "failure", because there was still no Palestinian state. The same Israeli journalists are reporting the same things now. From what I hear, the American public has much larger worries than Israel now and isn"t really paying attention to Israel. The US media is divided along party lines, pro- or anti-Obama. What has surprised me, though, is that many Israeli journalists (and some liberal American journos) who would otherwise criticize Netanyahu have been very supportive these past two weeks. Many Israelis see Hussein-Obama"s manufactured crisis and offensive behavior for what it is: deliberate insult and offense aimed at furthering the Arab cause, where the Arabs cannot do so themselves. That the US appears to be meddling in the internal affairs of another country, promoting a very compliant Zippi Livni for PM and trying to topple Netanyahu, is very offensive to nearly all Israelis. It is ironic that Obama"s major efforts at "regime change" are in Israel and not in Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Venezuela, Cuba, etc. Whose interests is Hussein-Obama really working for?

Posted by Jake in Jerusalem on 2010-03-26 10:40:56 GMT